Validate the structure of your screens and journeys before investing in final design or development: that's the whole point of a wireframe. A fast, iterative step, far less expensive to fix than a full UI design or a product already in production.
A wireframe represents the structure of an interface: where the blocks are, in what order, with what hierarchy. It defines journeys, screen sequences and organisation decisions, without being distracted by colours or fonts.
A wireframe can also illustrate screen behaviours: what happens on click, how a modal opens, what state a form is in after validation. These annotated interactions complement the functional analysis and give teams a clear picture of the expected result, without waiting for development.
The choice of format depends on the client, the context and the people involved. Some read a black-and-white wireframe very well. Others need to project themselves into something more concrete to validate or test.
Black and white, with no colour or final image. Blocks, content areas, buttons and navigation paths are represented with greys and schematic shapes. The goal is to reason about structure, not aesthetics.
This format suits product and design teams used to reading conceptual mockups, internal framing workshops, and the first iterations where everything can still change quickly.
With colours, typography close to reality and real or realistic content. It is not yet a finalised UI design, but the interface is close enough to the final product for everyone to project themselves, including non-technical stakeholders or users in testing.
This format is particularly useful during client presentations, validations with decision-makers, or when testing sessions need an interface dynamic enough to trigger authentic reactions.
Whether classic or high-fidelity, a wireframe is designed and iterated far faster than a full UI design. Ideas are tested, blocks moved, a journey restructured in a few hours. Fixing at this stage costs almost nothing.
Identify the journeys to model, the key features, the known technical constraints and the user profiles involved.
Classic or high-fidelity, depending on the target audience: decision-makers, product teams, or end users involved in testing.
Revise the structure based on feedback, without ever getting stuck on visual details. Each feedback cycle takes a few hours, not several days.
Present to stakeholders for alignment, or use directly in user testing sessions to observe real behaviour, ahead of a UX mission or development.
Wireframes are delivered as a shared Figma or Axure file, with screens organised by journey, behaviour annotations and, if needed, a clickable prototype for testing or presentations. Design and development teams can take them over directly.
Figma or Axure
Shared file with annotated screens, navigation flows and a clickable prototype.